Skip to main content

Thank You, But No Thank You

President Obama Praises General Who Scouffed At His Administration

As we reported last evening U.S. military bad boy, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the former top U.S. commander in Afghanistan resigned over his remarks made about the Obama administration and civilian officials.

In an address today in the Rose Garden President Obama stated, "Mr. McChrystal's conduct does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general. It undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system. And it erodes the trust that’s necessary for our team to work together to achieve our objectives in Afghanistan."

As such, President Obama accepted McChrystal's resignation earlier today, replacing the loose-lipped military top-brass with General David H. Petraeus.
 
The decision to accept the resignation was not an easy one for the president and he commended Petraeus on making a great personal sacrifice to himself and to his family for accepting his new post. "He is setting an extraordinary example of service and patriotism by assuming this difficult post."
 

(Can't view the video?  Click here.)

Amid McChrystal's scathing remarks, President Obama said "Stan McChrystal has always shown great courtesy and carried out my orders faithfully. I've got great admiration for him and for his long record of service in uniform."

Really?

Great courtesy, Mr. President?   You read his remarks about your administration.  Remember?  Those words (probably spoken in uniform) angered you, as relayed yesterday to the media by White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs.

But I do understand your being the bigger person in all this when you said, "...war is bigger than any one man or woman, whether a private, a general, or a president. And as difficult as it is to lose General McChrystal, I believe that it is the right decision for our national security."

McChrystal was summoned to Washington from Afghanistan to meet with the president. Those in opposition said the president could have accepted the General's resignation - from a distance.

William S. Cohen, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, spoke with talk radio's Joe Madison of The Joe Madison Show today, and voiced his opinion about President Obama’s decision to meet with General McChrystal.

Cohen stated that if it was up to him, and the decision was to fire McChrystal, he would not have summoned the General to the White House, but instead would have asked Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to make a phone call and say “thank you very much for your service, but it is no longer required.”

Whether from afar in Afghanistan, or here at home, Mr. McChrystal, your service is no longer required.

Related
Obama Calls McChrystal "One of Our Finest Soldiers"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Story Behind Presidents' Day

Did you know Presidents' Day isn’t just about a day off?  Originally established to honor George Washington’s birthday, it has since grown to celebrate all U.S. presidents who’ve shaped the country’s path. It’s a day to reflect on leadership, service, and the values that drive national progress. Presidents' Day dates back to 1879, when it was first recognized as a federal holiday for Washington. Later, Abraham Lincoln’s February birthday brought attention. By 1971, the Uniform Monday Holiday Act combined the days, creating the long weekend many know today—but its purpose goes far deeper. From decisions that forged independence to policies steering modern challenges, U.S. presidents have helped shape history. It's a moment to appreciate lessons in courage, responsibility, and the impact of strong leadership on society today. How do you celebrate Presidents' Day?  Is it by learning about the leaders who influenced American history? Do you read their biographies, visit ...

Government job loss under the Trump administration, since 2016. Are you at risk in 2025?

Under President Trump's first term in office, America experienced job declines. Data from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) suggests that the total number of federal employees decreased by approximately 1.3% from 2016 to 2020, resulting in a loss of approximately 18,000 government positions. This decline was achieved largely through attrition, as the administration emphasized not filling vacancies rather than implementing widespread layoffs.   Also: What about social security?  Trump has sad that he does not plan to change social security, however, one case shows how a senior experienced   difficulty getting their due benefits .  Job Losses in Government Agencies since 2016. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA faced significant cuts under the Trump administration, with staffing levels dropping from approximately 15,000 employees in 2016 to about 14,000 by 2020 citing budget cuts and decreasing regulatory enforcement practices.  Department of Ed...